Quote of the day
For two decades, I have watched young women experience the continual “mission creep” of how pornography—and now Internet pornography—has lowered their sense of their own sexual value and their actual sexual value. When I came of age in the seventies, it was still pretty cool to be able to offer a young man the actual presence of a naked, willing young woman. There were more young men who wanted to be with naked women than there were naked women on the market. If there was nothing actively alarming about you, you could get a pretty enthusiastic response by just showing up. Your boyfriend may have seen Playboy, but hey, you could move, you were warm, you were real. Thirty years ago, simple lovemaking was considered erotic in the pornography that entered mainstream consciousness: When Behind the Green Door first opened, clumsy, earnest, missionary-position intercourse was still considered to be a huge turn-on.
Well, I am 40, and mine is the last female generation to experience that sense of sexual confidence and security in what we had to offer. Our younger sisters had to compete with video porn in the eighties and nineties, when intercourse was not hot enough. Now you have to offer—or flirtatiously suggest—the lesbian scene, the ejaculate-in-the-face scene. Being naked is not enough; you have to be buff, be tan with no tan lines, have the surgically hoisted breasts and the Brazilian bikini wax—just like porn stars. (In my gym, the 40-year-old women have adult pubic hair; the twentysomethings have all been trimmed and styled.) Pornography is addictive; the baseline gets ratcheted up. By the new millennium, a vagina—which, by the way, used to have a pretty high “exchange value,” as Marxist economists would say—wasn’t enough; it barely registered on the thrill scale. All mainstream porn—and certainly the Internet—made routine use of all available female orifices.
The porn loop is de rigueur, no longer outside the pale; starlets in tabloids boast of learning to strip from professionals; the “cool girls” go with guys to the strip clubs, and even ask for lap dances; college girls are expected to tease guys at keg parties with lesbian kisses à la Britney and Madonna.
But does all this sexual imagery in the air mean that sex has been liberated—or is it the case that the relationship between the multi-billion-dollar porn industry, compulsiveness, and sexual appetite has become like the relationship between agribusiness, processed foods, supersize portions, and obesity? If your appetite is stimulated and fed by poor-quality material, it takes more junk to fill you up. People are not closer because of porn but further apart; people are not more turned on in their daily lives but less so.
-Naomi Wolf in New York Magazine






12 comments:
I dunno. On the one hand, I am not personally a fan of the kinds of porn that are really mainstream today. I have a different sort of taste in the girls I'd like to see, and a different sort of taste in the kinds of scenarios and clothes and all that. I'm 29, but I kinda prefer the stuff that Naomi Wolf is talking about -- tanlines and a reasonable amount of bush, but that's because I grew up looking at old Penthouse magazines.
But, I wouldn't go so far as to lay the blame on the pornography itself -- I think that's just a larger symptom of a sexual world wherein people don't have a lot of imagination, and so just kind of gobble up whatever.
But that goes for a lot of areas -- here it is, 2009, I can count on one hand the number of movies I've seen which suggest that people can be happy in romantic relationships that aren't fairytale monogamous arrangements. If I could find girls who are open to bigger ideas in that regard, then they can look like cookie-cutter blonde/tanned/implanted anal cockguzzlers all they want. Because that'd be really fresh.
So I think it's more like, Naomi is lamenting the existence of "The Mainstream," period, because it is a very powerful force in any area it chooses to be -- sexual behaviors, food choices, entertainment, etc. Sucks, but you can't force a minority opinion upon other people. The Internet is a powerful tool to find people who are into the kind of world you like. I should write her and let her know I am totally into women in their 40s with a healthy bush.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/01/13/palin-slams-bored-anonymous-pathetic-bloggers-who-lie/
cajun boy, palin's calling you out...
why would we ever take her or her doctor's word. has she ever heard of conflict of interest, dumb bitch!
This is one of the most insightful pieces I think i've ever read, mostly on account of the fact that the theme transcends the actual subject matter and serves as a very poignant critique of what the downsides are of our so-called "modern" society, which although has supposedly become more "advanced" has by no means improved our collective well-being. Thanks CB!
doesn't this make anyone want to say "oh shut up!"
I've never met a man who didn't know the difference between a real girl and a porn star. and if i did id remain convinced that it was thanks to his parents or chemical imbalances not the porn industry or bikini waxing trends. c'mon. This sort of banter feeds the issue that we claim to overcome; sexism, the general attitude that men are less than, inclined to be deviant, inclined to not appreciate women, inclined to abuse or be shallow in general...with these attitudes we create the dynamic that we the women are victims, trying so hard to please them, hoping to compete with porn stars, wanting to feel beautiful, CMON!have a little self worth!
This is spot-on. Quantity over quality is the American way of life more than ever.
"the relationship between the multi-billion-dollar porn industry, compulsiveness, and sexual appetite has become like the relationship between agribusiness, processed foods, supersize portions, and obesity?"
I'm glad you posted this. I'm also 40 ( with Louisiana roots ) and frankly 90% of most porn is a turnoff. It's never been clearer that people are being paid to have sex. Often times very beautiful young women are being "paid raped" on camera. If it's a fantasy with consenting adults fine, but more often than not we are seeing hatred towards women passed off as sex.
Wonderful!
hence Palin
Well we couldn't all bang each other and smoke pot all day like the 60's and 70's. We grew up in the area of AIDS ravishing cities. Sorry but if me whacking it to Jenna Jameson keeps me from getting a one night stand pregnant or contracting an STD its not even a question.
Girls are getting fake boobs regardless and why not. Porn stars usually are in decent shape not even model skinny. For a country facing an obesity epidemic in the heartland they could do worse than aspire for such a body!
I understand that porn has made girls self concious about their bodies but you could blame Vogue, Cosmo, and the fashion industry as well. Blame digital retouching while we're at it.
Huh, the coming of age in the 70's doesn't make sense to me unless this was written a while ago. I'm a 40 year old woman (that sure sounds unsexy) and I don't recall doin' it when I was 7. However, I agree with the porn thing. Recently I watched a bunch of porn on youporn and redtube and was amazed to see how it's all basically the same. The female bodies are pretty close to the same kind of tits/hip ratio, tan, shaved etc.. and the sex was kind of the same too. The weirdest thing about it was that the women were all really vocal, "uhn, uhn, uhn, yeaaahhhh!" and the guys were almost always pretty silent and thrusting away...or giving directions. It didn't seem actually very sexual, more like dirty exercise or something. Porkercise?
The shaved thing is weird too. Trimmed seems okay but totally bald is pretty repulsive. There's a good book I read recently for a sex education class called 'Female Chauvinist Pigs' by Ariel Levy and it's all about the new(ish) raunch culture--very similar to what Naomi Wolfe was talking about. This kind of sex has nothing to do with being erotic but I think it's been around for a long time. Think about what those crazy Romans were up to. If they could have had fake tits and pump up wangs they probably would have gone for it.
On another note, have you seen the Helga pictures by Andrew Wyeth? It seems like everyone probably has-- the nudes he did of her are very erotic--you can just tell there was some deep lust there.
6:52 PM
sorry...but bald is beautiful
Bald pubes = small child. No pubic hair means your cooch looks like a freaking five year old.
Sexual turns ons, in order to remain a turn on, have to go further and further out there in terms of behavior and thrills.
Humans have basic needs and when those are met (food, clothing, housing, sex for procreation). When those needs are met, we bump up the ante... better food, nicer clothes, bigger abode, wilder sex.
The same thing has happened in ever society that reaches a certain point of development (see Rome, for example).
Same shit, different century, just better media.
Gindy
Post a Comment